Written By: Anna McCowan, Software Solutions Manager at Keysight Technologies
In our digital world, software is the engine that drives us forward. Companies can only grow if their software infrastructure allows. But what happens when your in-house tools cannot keep up with emerging technologies, software innovation, or your future business goals?
Keysight commissioned Forrester Consulting to survey software testing decision-makers at global enterprises to research their current software testing approach and how their approach will impact their future business decisions.
Weighing the Pros and Cons of In-House Testing vs. Automated Software Testing Solutions
Software testing is an essential part of the software development lifecycle. It ensures that applications are high quality, meet end-user requirements and are free from defects or bugs. Many organisations use their resources and expertise to perform software testing in-house. However, as Forrester found, decision-makers have several compelling reasons to move to a commercial software testing solution from an in-house one.
Commercial Software Testing
Commercial software testing solutions are designed to help organisations improve the quality of their software and reduce time-to-market. By leveraging the latest testing tools, methodologies and best practices, these solutions can help organisations identify defects and bugs earlier in the software development lifecycle. Additionally, commercial solutions can lead to reduced development costs and improved software quality. Organizations can free up their resources and focus on core business activities, which can help accelerate time-to-market.
According to Forrester’s research data, respondents stated that “using commercial solutions to reduce testing costs was the biggest business improvement their organisations expected.” Furthermore, the impact was significant or transformational for their organisations.
In-House Software Testing
One key finding of the study was that in-house solutions could weigh heavily on a company’s productivity and resources. According to the research, respondents with in-house solutions expect their automation investments will have a less significant impact on their organisation’s ability to scale and reduce overall testing costs than those with commercially built solutions.
Also, of the respondents with in-house solutions, 63% use three or more development tools or automation solutions to conduct their testing. Having multiple dispersed testing tools costs much more than a single test automation platform.
In addition, despite having more tools at their disposal, a vast majority disclose that they are doing a lot of time-consuming and expensive manual testing to bridge gaps.
“Companies can only grow if their software infrastructure allows. But what happens when your in-house tools cannot keep up with emerging technologies, software innovation, or your future business goals?”
While solutions built in-house may initially appear to be more cost-effective, they underdeliver on these promises as buyers realise the reality of hidden costs associated with their implementation and maintenance.
In contrast, according to the research, respondents using commercial software testing solutions only require one or two to meet their testing needs, requiring less manual intervention.
Inability to Scale and Increased Software Testing Complexities Drive Change
In today’s competitive business landscape, business leaders seek opportunities to scale. Keeping up with the latest technologies is crucial to staying competitive. The Forrester study states, “Companies must mature their automation strategy to meet customer demands and deliver at scale.”
While in-house software testing can be cost-effective in some cases, it can also be expensive, especially when considering the costs of hiring and training specialised staff, purchasing and maintaining testing infrastructure and tools, and managing testing projects.
According to the report, the inability to scale is a tipping point for organisations with in-house solutions. As companies strive to streamline their technology, they often encounter the challenge of integrating legacy applications and mainframe systems against a more modernized technology stack.
Because of the vastly different infrastructure, these systems require extensive testing to ensure the user experience is not compromised. Unfortunately, relying on open-source and manual testing for these complex systems is not robust enough.
Barriers to Transforming to an Automated Software Test Approach
Time spent writing scripts, fixing bugs, and manually testing all possible user journeys can quickly add up and often becomes the bottleneck when implementing a new feature release. Consequently, automation growth stalls and companies cannot deliver differentiable, high-quality products.
Forrester asked what barriers prevented companies from investing or continuing to invest in automated testing technologies.
- 46% of participants stated they lacked the in-house expertise to implement and/or maintain a platform.
- 46% said they lacked funding.
- 36% said they lacked the skills necessary to define the requirements.
Technological Advancements Increase Software Testing Challenges
Technology complexity is a growing challenge and requires higher-level tools. Even scripted automation is not enough. The new generation of software testing needs to provide advanced analytics algorithms tuned to the evolving challenges and the use of machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) to solve complex problems.
As companies strive to streamline their technology, they often encounter the challenge of integrating legacy applications and mainframe systems against a more modernised technology stack. Because of the vastly different infrastructure, these systems require extensive testing to ensure the user experience is not compromised.
The dramatic shift to online services witnessed over the last decade has forced enterprises to become more adaptive. As companies continue their digital journeys and technological innovations accelerate, transitioning to software testing automation is becoming a necessity.
To be successful, organisations need a software testing solution that will allow them to scale adequately and affordably, align with current and future technologies, and ensure compliance with increasingly complex software testing requirements.
Archive
- October 2024(44)
- September 2024(94)
- August 2024(100)
- July 2024(99)
- June 2024(126)
- May 2024(155)
- April 2024(123)
- March 2024(112)
- February 2024(109)
- January 2024(95)
- December 2023(56)
- November 2023(86)
- October 2023(97)
- September 2023(89)
- August 2023(101)
- July 2023(104)
- June 2023(113)
- May 2023(103)
- April 2023(93)
- March 2023(129)
- February 2023(77)
- January 2023(91)
- December 2022(90)
- November 2022(125)
- October 2022(117)
- September 2022(137)
- August 2022(119)
- July 2022(99)
- June 2022(128)
- May 2022(112)
- April 2022(108)
- March 2022(121)
- February 2022(93)
- January 2022(110)
- December 2021(92)
- November 2021(107)
- October 2021(101)
- September 2021(81)
- August 2021(74)
- July 2021(78)
- June 2021(92)
- May 2021(67)
- April 2021(79)
- March 2021(79)
- February 2021(58)
- January 2021(55)
- December 2020(56)
- November 2020(59)
- October 2020(78)
- September 2020(72)
- August 2020(64)
- July 2020(71)
- June 2020(74)
- May 2020(50)
- April 2020(71)
- March 2020(71)
- February 2020(58)
- January 2020(62)
- December 2019(57)
- November 2019(64)
- October 2019(25)
- September 2019(24)
- August 2019(14)
- July 2019(23)
- June 2019(54)
- May 2019(82)
- April 2019(76)
- March 2019(71)
- February 2019(67)
- January 2019(75)
- December 2018(44)
- November 2018(47)
- October 2018(74)
- September 2018(54)
- August 2018(61)
- July 2018(72)
- June 2018(62)
- May 2018(62)
- April 2018(73)
- March 2018(76)
- February 2018(8)
- January 2018(7)
- December 2017(6)
- November 2017(8)
- October 2017(3)
- September 2017(4)
- August 2017(4)
- July 2017(2)
- June 2017(5)
- May 2017(6)
- April 2017(11)
- March 2017(8)
- February 2017(16)
- January 2017(10)
- December 2016(12)
- November 2016(20)
- October 2016(7)
- September 2016(102)
- August 2016(168)
- July 2016(141)
- June 2016(149)
- May 2016(117)
- April 2016(59)
- March 2016(85)
- February 2016(153)
- December 2015(150)