With the ever-growing reach of artificial intelligence (AI), the fear that many people hold is that they will be sacrificed for the cheaper, faster and more efficient AI. But are these fears relevant? It is true that AI will make many day-to-day activities a lot easier, but will that mean fewer jobs for the people? What is true throughout history and whenever a revolution occurs, though jobs were lost, people still had work. As some jobs get replaced, we find other and usually more productive uses of people’s time in new roles that may not have existed before. That is how progress tends to happen and how we coexist with new technology.
One of the dilemmas that is on many business leaders’ minds is in finding the balance between adopting the latest technology and saving jobs. It’s difficult to make decisions that may look like the results will be to sacrifice members of staff. However, the hard truth is if business leaders don’t make those tough decisions, other companies will make progress before them; at which point the issue will not be about workforce reduction, it will be about whether the “doors can remain open” at all.
In this new frontier, nothing is in black and white. It’s not the best of ideas to place all the eggs in one basket. It would be exceptionally dangerous to think that AI can replace an experienced team of employees and taking that approach may also end up being the thing that puts you under. AI is a learning technology, and learning from an experienced workforce not just in one hit but over extended periods of time, can be a potent combination.
An excellent example of that is how an AI will be able to improve lawyer workloads by 200 times and accuracy by 80%. AI is able to read through much more text and look for evidence with much higher precision, allowing the human lawyers to focus on the more difficult points. AI still makes mistakes and humans can focus their time on the errors left after AI has done the initial review. Speed of work is therefore improved and is of better quality.
The Government of Malaysia is also looking at ways to make the transition towards a collaborative coexistence between the two entities become a reality.
Ybhg Dato’ Vignaesvaran, Chief Executive, Human Resource Development Fund (HRDF) Malaysia, shared that he hoped HR heads will play a proactive role in making sure their staff are given the skills and training required.
The HRDF themselves use analytics to find the most effective training that is productive and gives money back value. This, he said, will show companies the true value of the training they send the staff for, and training companies at the same time get to adjust their capabilities to improve their syllabus.
Dato’ Vicks shared an example of how improving workers’ skillsets can actually benefit both the company and the staff. “There was a company that was upgrading to use AI in place of three employees and asked me if they can let those three staff go. I said don’t let them go. We sent them for training, and now their salary has tripled,” he shared. That’s the value the company is able to gain from those employees. The point he made is that by training and enabling your staff and combining their skills with AI, the combination is better than just thinking that it’s an either/or decision.
The critical issue here being that HR needs to be the catalyst and start thinking how to address the soon-to-be power struggle between what technology can offer and what humans can offer. Even lawyers and doctors will need to rethink their roles as AI and machine learning become better adept at those specialised jobs than humans.
Individuals and companies need to become digitised. One cannot go without the other. By integrating the two, it will allow the business and the workforce to learn to grow together and improve on workflow and deliverables from the ground up. AI is here to stay and set to transform every aspect of the business world. Therefore, it is necessary to build the bridges between human and machine that accentuates each other’s abilities for a better overall organisation.
Archive
- October 2024(27)
- September 2024(94)
- August 2024(100)
- July 2024(99)
- June 2024(126)
- May 2024(155)
- April 2024(123)
- March 2024(112)
- February 2024(109)
- January 2024(95)
- December 2023(56)
- November 2023(86)
- October 2023(97)
- September 2023(89)
- August 2023(101)
- July 2023(104)
- June 2023(113)
- May 2023(103)
- April 2023(93)
- March 2023(129)
- February 2023(77)
- January 2023(91)
- December 2022(90)
- November 2022(125)
- October 2022(117)
- September 2022(137)
- August 2022(119)
- July 2022(99)
- June 2022(128)
- May 2022(112)
- April 2022(108)
- March 2022(121)
- February 2022(93)
- January 2022(110)
- December 2021(92)
- November 2021(107)
- October 2021(101)
- September 2021(81)
- August 2021(74)
- July 2021(78)
- June 2021(92)
- May 2021(67)
- April 2021(79)
- March 2021(79)
- February 2021(58)
- January 2021(55)
- December 2020(56)
- November 2020(59)
- October 2020(78)
- September 2020(72)
- August 2020(64)
- July 2020(71)
- June 2020(74)
- May 2020(50)
- April 2020(71)
- March 2020(71)
- February 2020(58)
- January 2020(62)
- December 2019(57)
- November 2019(64)
- October 2019(25)
- September 2019(24)
- August 2019(14)
- July 2019(23)
- June 2019(54)
- May 2019(82)
- April 2019(76)
- March 2019(71)
- February 2019(67)
- January 2019(75)
- December 2018(44)
- November 2018(47)
- October 2018(74)
- September 2018(54)
- August 2018(61)
- July 2018(72)
- June 2018(62)
- May 2018(62)
- April 2018(73)
- March 2018(76)
- February 2018(8)
- January 2018(7)
- December 2017(6)
- November 2017(8)
- October 2017(3)
- September 2017(4)
- August 2017(4)
- July 2017(2)
- June 2017(5)
- May 2017(6)
- April 2017(11)
- March 2017(8)
- February 2017(16)
- January 2017(10)
- December 2016(12)
- November 2016(20)
- October 2016(7)
- September 2016(102)
- August 2016(168)
- July 2016(141)
- June 2016(149)
- May 2016(117)
- April 2016(59)
- March 2016(85)
- February 2016(153)
- December 2015(150)