Written By: Katie Björk, Director of Communications and Solution Marketing, Identity and Access Management, HID, and Vito Fabbrizio, Managing Director, Biometrics, Extended Access Technologies, HID.
Growing demand for enhanced security that is easier for the end user to manage is pushing popularity of biometric technology to unprecedented levels, with adoption expected to grow by nearly three times by 2028 to more than USD $87 billion. Unlike traditional security measures like passwords and physical identification cards or keys, biometric technology uses fingerprints, facial, iris and even behavioural characteristics to authenticate users.
The seamless user experience, increased security and ease make biometric authentication a superior option for healthcare organisations, financial institutions, government agencies and organisations needing to improve their cybersecurity strategy.
The appeal and popularity of biometrics are evident. With newer generations of smart devices already coming with embedded biometric authentication capabilities to unlock phones and access apps such as banks, healthcare and digital wallets apps, end users are increasingly expecting these passwordless, contactless experiences.
Today’s Biometrics
An estimated 4.7 billion people use smartphones today, according to Statista, with newer smartphone models coming equipped with at least one integrated feature for biometric authentication, typically involving facial or fingerprint recognition. Biometric authentication presents a secure and convenient substitute for traditional passwords or PINs.
The FIDO passkey is one example. When a user is asked to sign-in to an app of website, the user can simply sign in with the same biometric that is used to unlock the device being used (mobile, computer or security key).
The passkey’s rapid growth in popularity has some experts predicting it will soon become the dominant form of passwordless identification, with tech giants Google, Microsoft, and Apple and key authentication vendors such as HID having already adopted the technology in their ecosystems. In fact, market revenue of passwordless identification systems is projected to grow 27 percent to 53.6 billion by 2030.
Facial recognition is also gaining popularity, driven in part by government utilisation with drivers’ licences, national ID cards, and passports to protect against identity fraud. And, because of advancements in computer graphics, which led to impressive improvements in photo and video quality, facial recognition technology has progressed remarkably. Combined with the latest enhancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML), for example, facial recognition has become impressively accurate and convenient. While there are concerns regarding matching bias, margins of errors, and false match rates, security experts nonetheless say facial recognition use cases will increase significantly over the next few years.
As a result, modern cameras today, when fusing AI and ML with multispectral imaging (MSI) technology, can handle challenging lighting conditions and deliver superior presentation attack detection (PAD) to detect whether there is fraud. Additionally, the possibility to take the algorithms and matching capabilities, which used to only belong in big server databases, can now be done on the camera device, a.k.a biometrics at the edge, so it is able to make biometric processing very quickly, drastically improves the user experience.
“The seamless user experience, increased security and ease make biometric authentication a superior option for healthcare organisations, financial institutions, government agencies and organisations needing to improve their cybersecurity strategy.”
Taking Authentication to the Next Level with Behavioural Biometrics
As digital frauds become rampant and more sophisticated, behavioural biometrics also leverage AI and ML to identify unique and measurable patterns in human behaviour. Behavioural biometric data consists of identifying and learning actual user activities so that identity is validated and intent is understood.
User activities such as logging in to the application, navigation to a specific page, transaction checkout, etc. and the data that characterises the user as a human being, such as mouse movements, typing cadence, touch events, swipe patterns, etc., represent behavioural biometry, which can uniquely characterise a user with a reasonable amount of analysis and proper processing.
This profile is continuously updated, improved, and enriched in real time, so it can be used to identify a user uniquely and seamlessly. These markers, augmented with user-specific information such as IP address, device, time and navigation patterns, deliver the best contextual value resulting in a high fraud detection rate and decreased number of falsely rejected users.
The Paradox of Regulatory Compliance and Trust
Regulatory concerns go hand-in-hand with technological advances and biometric identification is no exception. Privacy laws are expanding in tandem with biometrics on a global scale, including the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), and others.
In an effort to accelerate Malaysia’s digitalisation initiatives, the Digital Identity Development Project (IDN) was spearheaded to enable a user-controlled biometric digital identification and verification system that matches an individual’s biometric data with a government database to distribute targeted subsidies and other benefits to the populace, amongst other uses.
It is unquestionable that protecting an individual’s biometric data, making sure companies use the data responsibly is important. But the paradox is that this very biometric information is used to protect the integrity and the privacy of someone’s identification, their assets and the access to places.
The complex regulatory landscape can be a barrier to broader adoption of biometric technologies. Many smaller organisations are fearful of some of the laws and how they have been enacted and enforced by expensive lawsuits and fines.
There are other challenges impeding broader adoption of biometric technology. One is the public’s worry that their biometric data will be secure and ethically managed. Second is consistency with the devices it is being used to secure. Biometrics are highly dependent on the environment in which they are captured—the device in broader terms. If it is on a camera, that camera and the reader must work reliably.
It is also important to consider the suitability. For example, requiring facial or fingerprint recognition is not ideal when the user is driving a car. In this case, voice recognition would be a better fit.
Best Practices for Growing Adoption
Education and communicating with customers and end users will help them better understand how the biometric technology being used works and what will happen with the data. For example, employers using biometrics for time and attendance or at the point of sale for fraud and abuse prevention should explain how the technology is helping the customer, what is being collected and why.
“It is unquestionable that protecting an individual’s biometric data, making sure companies use the data responsibly is important. But the paradox is that this very biometric information is used to protect the integrity and the privacy of someone’s identification, their assets and the access to places.”
To this end, it is important to partner with companies that have a modular approach to biometrics, as there is no one-size-fits-all solution. In other words, trying to deploy the same solution for every use case or industry is not ideal. Instead, it is important to stay laser-focused on the end user experience by reducing the level of friction, use data encryption, obtain user consent, and create different components to allow resellers and end users to integrate biometrics into their applications as seamlessly as possible. This way, a solution can be tailored to the various use cases and maybe even their geographic regions.
Looking Forward
The future of biometrics is bright as the public’s comfort level with the technology’s security grows.
As advancements in biometric technology continue to evolve and security providers adopt ethical and privacy considerations, as well as address all potential vulnerabilities within their solutions, the public’s trust and confidence will continue to strengthen.
Archive
- October 2024(44)
- September 2024(94)
- August 2024(100)
- July 2024(99)
- June 2024(126)
- May 2024(155)
- April 2024(123)
- March 2024(112)
- February 2024(109)
- January 2024(95)
- December 2023(56)
- November 2023(86)
- October 2023(97)
- September 2023(89)
- August 2023(101)
- July 2023(104)
- June 2023(113)
- May 2023(103)
- April 2023(93)
- March 2023(129)
- February 2023(77)
- January 2023(91)
- December 2022(90)
- November 2022(125)
- October 2022(117)
- September 2022(137)
- August 2022(119)
- July 2022(99)
- June 2022(128)
- May 2022(112)
- April 2022(108)
- March 2022(121)
- February 2022(93)
- January 2022(110)
- December 2021(92)
- November 2021(107)
- October 2021(101)
- September 2021(81)
- August 2021(74)
- July 2021(78)
- June 2021(92)
- May 2021(67)
- April 2021(79)
- March 2021(79)
- February 2021(58)
- January 2021(55)
- December 2020(56)
- November 2020(59)
- October 2020(78)
- September 2020(72)
- August 2020(64)
- July 2020(71)
- June 2020(74)
- May 2020(50)
- April 2020(71)
- March 2020(71)
- February 2020(58)
- January 2020(62)
- December 2019(57)
- November 2019(64)
- October 2019(25)
- September 2019(24)
- August 2019(14)
- July 2019(23)
- June 2019(54)
- May 2019(82)
- April 2019(76)
- March 2019(71)
- February 2019(67)
- January 2019(75)
- December 2018(44)
- November 2018(47)
- October 2018(74)
- September 2018(54)
- August 2018(61)
- July 2018(72)
- June 2018(62)
- May 2018(62)
- April 2018(73)
- March 2018(76)
- February 2018(8)
- January 2018(7)
- December 2017(6)
- November 2017(8)
- October 2017(3)
- September 2017(4)
- August 2017(4)
- July 2017(2)
- June 2017(5)
- May 2017(6)
- April 2017(11)
- March 2017(8)
- February 2017(16)
- January 2017(10)
- December 2016(12)
- November 2016(20)
- October 2016(7)
- September 2016(102)
- August 2016(168)
- July 2016(141)
- June 2016(149)
- May 2016(117)
- April 2016(59)
- March 2016(85)
- February 2016(153)
- December 2015(150)