Authored By: Jeff Harris, Vice President – Keysight Technologies
Today’s newest electronic products are increasingly complex due to evolving standards, applications distributed across multiple cloud environments and the acceleration of an “all in one” expectation from users. This increased complexity directly impacts the electronic design, development, emulation and test coverage for new products, which puts increased pressure on development teams.
With so many potential vectors to test, there is an expectation that automating design and test procedures with intelligent insights across the workflow—in essence, automating intelligence—is mainstream. However, according to a recent Forrester study commissioned by Keysight Technologies, 89% of companies still employ manual processes, with only 11% of companies fully automating their test matrices. While full automation adoption is low, companies do see its value, with 75% reporting some automation and nearly half wanting to fully automate in the next three years.
Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Digital Twins are Increasingly Desired for Complex Electronic System Development
In December 2021, Keysight commissioned Forrester Consulting to evaluate the use of data integration, analytics, Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) in a typical product development cycle. Forrester surveyed over 400 development leaders and asked them a series of questions related to how much they currently employ AI and ML in their product development process.
On the surface, most organisations reported they are satisfied with their current development approaches, with 86% being moderately to very satisfied. However, those same organisations reported that 84% of projects and designs are either complex, multilayer sub-systems, or integrated systems, which are not being tested.
“With so many potential vectors to test, there is an expectation that automating design and test procedures with intelligent insights across the workflow—in essence, automating intelligence—is mainstream.”
Despite what initially looks like satisfaction, the study found that companies feel the pressure to add more automation and intelligence to the electronic design process, especially when asked about the future.
Only 1 in 10 companies currently use full design and test automation in their development process, but the COVID pandemic has accelerated adoption of remote development and automated test sequencing. There will, most likely, also be a higher use of digital twins as development teams strive to continue working together from different locations.
Digital Twins and Emulation: Electronic Design’s New Paradigm
Hardware developers have long relied on emulation environments as part of the design process before prototyping. Using software-driven emulators, or digital twins, reduces the number of design variables by allowing them to measure the impact of different operating environments, conditions, and protocol evolutions against “known good” references. Similarly, software developers use agile scrum methods and test in virtual emulation sandboxes to build and deploy new features incrementally, while limiting the number of variables.
The rising complexity of electronic product interactions—communication protocols that evolve, cloud platforms that evolve, continuous software and firmware updates—pose real challenges for developers as each introduces a slew of new variables for testing. Using test automation and continuously updated digital twins wherever possible enables development teams to test more variables and reduce the risk of non-performance for a specific design.
Automating Intelligence Across the Electronic Design Workflow
Test automation is rapidly becoming a must-have requirement. Currently, a fully manual test plan based on human data entry, some python or graphical programming and Excel spreadsheets can only cover a small portion of possible user stories. Each must be updated manually for every software release, lengthening the electronic design cycle.
However, while test automation software is part of the answer and definitely needed, it is not enough. Test automation is only as good as the analytics and insights they produce. In the Forrester survey, respondents disclosed that their test routines covered “more than needed” just over half the time. While test automation can help reduce the time it takes to test, it does not solve the test reach, quality and coverage question. Automating intelligence across the design workflow, with farther-reaching test sequences, all backed with analytics and insights, solves both test speed and test reach at the same time.
“Using software-driven emulators, or digital twins, reduces the number of design variables by allowing them to measure the impact of different operating environments, conditions, and protocol evolutions against “known good” references.”
Automating intelligence is a software model that builds on the industry’s deepest measurement technologies and simulations to provide rapid insights that developers can use to get to market with greater speed and lower risk. Whether measuring power and ground, waveform signal quality, high-speed data I/O’s, network integrity, or application delivery, we must consider what it will take to for customers to speed the development processes.
What Does Automating Intelligence Success Look Like?
“Faster, better, cheaper—pick two” is an old adage when people would strategize new developments. Assuming nothing else changes, that might still be true. However, by integrating automated intelligence across the development workflow you may be able to achieve all three.
- Faster. Ability to reduce product time-to-market.
- Better. A higher-quality product that increases customer satisfaction.
- Cheaper. More agile and efficient product development cycles.
Development teams that have already adopted this approach are reaping the benefits today. Whether a product development involves emerging electronics using the latest wireless communications standards, high-speed data transfers, complex cloud networking, or dealing with distributed software application delivery, the focus is the same. Structure your lab design and test solutions to deliver insightful analytics at each stage. Power them with AI and ML so they are always exploring ‘what else’ needs work. Automate your development environment just like your do in manufacturing to minimize development timelines while ensuring the best possible product performance.
Archive
- October 2024(19)
- September 2024(94)
- August 2024(100)
- July 2024(99)
- June 2024(126)
- May 2024(155)
- April 2024(123)
- March 2024(112)
- February 2024(109)
- January 2024(95)
- December 2023(56)
- November 2023(86)
- October 2023(97)
- September 2023(89)
- August 2023(101)
- July 2023(104)
- June 2023(113)
- May 2023(103)
- April 2023(93)
- March 2023(129)
- February 2023(77)
- January 2023(91)
- December 2022(90)
- November 2022(125)
- October 2022(117)
- September 2022(137)
- August 2022(119)
- July 2022(99)
- June 2022(128)
- May 2022(112)
- April 2022(108)
- March 2022(121)
- February 2022(93)
- January 2022(110)
- December 2021(92)
- November 2021(107)
- October 2021(101)
- September 2021(81)
- August 2021(74)
- July 2021(78)
- June 2021(92)
- May 2021(67)
- April 2021(79)
- March 2021(79)
- February 2021(58)
- January 2021(55)
- December 2020(56)
- November 2020(59)
- October 2020(78)
- September 2020(72)
- August 2020(64)
- July 2020(71)
- June 2020(74)
- May 2020(50)
- April 2020(71)
- March 2020(71)
- February 2020(58)
- January 2020(62)
- December 2019(57)
- November 2019(64)
- October 2019(25)
- September 2019(24)
- August 2019(14)
- July 2019(23)
- June 2019(54)
- May 2019(82)
- April 2019(76)
- March 2019(71)
- February 2019(67)
- January 2019(75)
- December 2018(44)
- November 2018(47)
- October 2018(74)
- September 2018(54)
- August 2018(61)
- July 2018(72)
- June 2018(62)
- May 2018(62)
- April 2018(73)
- March 2018(76)
- February 2018(8)
- January 2018(7)
- December 2017(6)
- November 2017(8)
- October 2017(3)
- September 2017(4)
- August 2017(4)
- July 2017(2)
- June 2017(5)
- May 2017(6)
- April 2017(11)
- March 2017(8)
- February 2017(16)
- January 2017(10)
- December 2016(12)
- November 2016(20)
- October 2016(7)
- September 2016(102)
- August 2016(168)
- July 2016(141)
- June 2016(149)
- May 2016(117)
- April 2016(59)
- March 2016(85)
- February 2016(153)
- December 2015(150)