When it comes to brand loyalty and price increases, one thing has become increasingly clear; consumers vote with their wallets.
In an age where competition is fierce and consumers can research alternatives at the click of the “search” button, consumers are making it clear that price increases without increased value are a big “no.”
Establish brands are finding this out at their peril. Take John West in the consumer food space. This year, in an attempt to combat a rise in global commodity costs, they decided to increase their prices. The net results? John West saw a drop in revenue to the lowest levels they have seen since 1999!
We are currently seeing this play out in the Java development space, where earlier this year, technology giant, Oracle, made a significant change in their Java pricing (moving from instance-related pricing to a price model based on the number of headcounts) which has materially impacted their customers’ licence renewal fees.
Existing customers are finding that their licence renewal hasn’t just crept up but, in many instances, has increased four or five times. In fact, analysis of over a dozen active Oracle Java contracts conducted by Palisade Compliance showed that prices could increase by up to 10X.
The enterprise tech space is somewhat different from the FMCG consumer space. It’s not always easy for users to walk away from a technology they have invested in as there are perceived risks in moving away from a trusted technology to an alternative that may involve learning curves and other costs.
However, this large hike in price has caused Oracle Java platform users to think about their wallets and look around for alternatives. Interestingly, once they do, they like what they see.
OpenJDK vendors like Azul not only offer users a cheaper alternative, but they do so with a no-risk, 100% compatible platform, easy migration and even advanced and enhanced functionalities for an improved overall solution.
Coming back to the cost, the differences companies are seeing are not just shaving off a few percentage points, they literally redefine the ROI of companies’ continued investment in Java development. It turns out that Oracle’s new headcount approach, means organisations need to cover everyone who is involved in their business. This extends beyond their own staff and includes staff at contractors, agents, consultants and outsourcers.
In the case of Azul, numerous customers have made the switch and in doing so have made savings that are nothing short of breathtaking.
Examples include a national broadcasting company that was facing an Oracle renewal bill of USD $937,944, but on switching to Azul, their licence cost was reduced more than 10-fold down to USD $89,286. Similarly, a global shipping and mailing company saw a reduction from USD $1,089,000 to USD $54,673.
Reduced cost is the compelling driver but an improved Java development environment is the icing on the cake.
Normally, voting with your wallet comes with a compromise, and often times people accept that compromise. However, in the case of moving from Oracle to Azul, there is no compromise.
Migrating to Azul can be very straightforward and simple for the vast majority of organisations because the OpenJDK distribution that Azul provides is built using the OpenJDK source code and undergoes extensive compatibility testing. And once the transition is done, you will find yourself enjoying:
- Broader platform support.
- Broader Java version support.
- Follow-the-sun support.
- Quarterly stabilised security updates.
- 100% open source.
- And much more.
Whether it’s consumer goods, food and beverage, or enterprise tech the rules of doing business are clear. Increase prices at your peril.
In the case of Java, not only have Oracle ignored that rule, but in doing so they are doing many Java teams a favour. They have provided a catalyst for companies to look around and survey the market. In doing so, many have found better technical alternatives that perhaps they should have been considering anyway. Notwithstanding the better solution, for many companies, not making the move just doesn’t make business sense.
To find out more about OpenJDK alternatives, click here for this paper on 8 considerations before you renew your Oracle Java licence.
Archive
- October 2024(44)
- September 2024(94)
- August 2024(100)
- July 2024(99)
- June 2024(126)
- May 2024(155)
- April 2024(123)
- March 2024(112)
- February 2024(109)
- January 2024(95)
- December 2023(56)
- November 2023(86)
- October 2023(97)
- September 2023(89)
- August 2023(101)
- July 2023(104)
- June 2023(113)
- May 2023(103)
- April 2023(93)
- March 2023(129)
- February 2023(77)
- January 2023(91)
- December 2022(90)
- November 2022(125)
- October 2022(117)
- September 2022(137)
- August 2022(119)
- July 2022(99)
- June 2022(128)
- May 2022(112)
- April 2022(108)
- March 2022(121)
- February 2022(93)
- January 2022(110)
- December 2021(92)
- November 2021(107)
- October 2021(101)
- September 2021(81)
- August 2021(74)
- July 2021(78)
- June 2021(92)
- May 2021(67)
- April 2021(79)
- March 2021(79)
- February 2021(58)
- January 2021(55)
- December 2020(56)
- November 2020(59)
- October 2020(78)
- September 2020(72)
- August 2020(64)
- July 2020(71)
- June 2020(74)
- May 2020(50)
- April 2020(71)
- March 2020(71)
- February 2020(58)
- January 2020(62)
- December 2019(57)
- November 2019(64)
- October 2019(25)
- September 2019(24)
- August 2019(14)
- July 2019(23)
- June 2019(54)
- May 2019(82)
- April 2019(76)
- March 2019(71)
- February 2019(67)
- January 2019(75)
- December 2018(44)
- November 2018(47)
- October 2018(74)
- September 2018(54)
- August 2018(61)
- July 2018(72)
- June 2018(62)
- May 2018(62)
- April 2018(73)
- March 2018(76)
- February 2018(8)
- January 2018(7)
- December 2017(6)
- November 2017(8)
- October 2017(3)
- September 2017(4)
- August 2017(4)
- July 2017(2)
- June 2017(5)
- May 2017(6)
- April 2017(11)
- March 2017(8)
- February 2017(16)
- January 2017(10)
- December 2016(12)
- November 2016(20)
- October 2016(7)
- September 2016(102)
- August 2016(168)
- July 2016(141)
- June 2016(149)
- May 2016(117)
- April 2016(59)
- March 2016(85)
- February 2016(153)
- December 2015(150)