This article was originally published by cio.com and can be viewed in full here
Big data has reshaped businesses in many ways, and now it’s even changing the way HR monitors employee engagement to improve both retention and customer satisfaction.
What if your HR department could use data to not only predict employee engagement, but also know when an employee might be looking to jump ship? That’s what Vip Sandhir, founder and CEO at HighGround, aims to do with his company’s latest employee engagement products. By creating systems that mine data directly from employees, the goal is to provide business leaders with better — and ongoing — insights into the weaknesses and strengths within the organization.
Using big data for performance evaluation allows companies to look at real-time data, rather than just annual reviews. This way, it’s easier to get an idea of the larger picture of how happy and engaged employees are across the organization. Sandhir says that annual reviews are often watered down, because the employee might not want to offend anyone or the person they’re unhappy with might be the same person conducting their review.
“We think the voice of the employee is missing in the workplace today,” says Sandhir. By offering a more interactive, streamlined daily process that measures employee’s happiness and unhappiness, businesses can get better insights into where problems lie to avoid high turnover.
“We put the platform in everyone’s hands, and we allow managers and employees to interact in a more continuous manner. On a daily basis, you might get a question asking how you feel at work today. So what our application does, is it starts to create a continuous dialogue with the employee,” says Sandhir.
Minimizing flight risks
Retaining talent is difficult, and it becomes even more difficult if that talent becomes resentful or unhappy in a negative working environment. Unhappy employees can lead to high turnover, which affects the business from every angle. For one company, Echo Global Logistics, HighGround’s service made a significant difference in its “flight risk,” minimizing turnover by 5 percent, which lead to increased productivity, customer retention and overall cost savings, Sandhir says.
“As companies add new leaders, people, techniques and different reactions, the system will learn as you go,” says Sandhir, “It becomes a method of two-way communication between manager and employee, which is key to gain insights into the overall success of the company from every employee.” He points to the increased two way communication this type of software can encourage, which can give business leaders and executives the overall picture of the company.
For example, some clients have installed this software across every retail store to take daily data on employee moods. “We’ve seen circumstances where stores have had very stable moods, and then over a very small period of time you’ll see that mood sort of drop, and we’ve seen companies investigate and tie that back — in some cases — to a particular new leader that was installed in that location.”
Echo Global Logistics says the service encourages employees and management to recognize the hard work they do. The company notes that this engagement has been important because the company grew quickly. To avoid any fallout from fast growth, the leaders wanted to retain the sense of community and culture within the organization.
“HighGround, which internally we refer to as Echo Engage, allows employees to recognize their colleagues for doing great work or helping them out. It also allows managers to make sure their employees do actually appreciate the work that they do by making it easy to give quick shout outs for just about anything,” says Cheryl Johnson, senior vice president of talent at Echo Global Logistics.
Customer feedback drives training
However, it’s not just employees who can go into the system to leave kudos and recognition. Customers also have the opportunity to leave feedback. In turn, says Johnson, that customer feedback helps drive employee training, engagement and allows leaders to find what the business is doing right and areas it might need to improve.
While engagement is great when it’s about positive recognition, the software can also unveil weak spots. For companies that can pinpoint the exact cause of unhappiness within a department or office location, it’s possible to save money by keeping employees from quitting just to get away from one person. That problem can be addressed on an individual level, saving time, energy and money in the long run.
Ultimately, employee engagement not only affects a company internally, it can seep out and negatively affect business outside of the organization. Sandhir points out that employee engagement is connected to customer satisfaction. If you have happy employees, you’ll have happier customers as a result. And getting a watered down picture of employee satisfaction just once a year through performance reviews won’t be enough to find problems before they start.
While implementing new technology like engagement software sounds great in theory, companies need to ensure employees actually adopt and use the software. Johnson says the company found success with getting employees on board with HighGround’s software by making it as easy to use and accessible as possible for employees. Workers can simply install a mobile app on their phone that Johnson says is as simple as using the mobile Facebook app. It’s allowed employees to quickly adopt the system and see the benefits of this type of personal reporting.
While Echo Global Logistics has seen improvements in expected areas such as engagement and establishing a cohesive company culture, the benefits have extended beyond that, says Johnson. She says that two surprising areas where they saw improvement through HighGround included visibility into “hidden talent within our organization,” as well as “rich customer feedback.”
If you look at how business operations have changed thanks to technology, it makes sense that it would also change the way HR oversees employee engagement. Sandhir also points out that the traditional performance review process is somewhat of a feedback loop. Most of the conversation becomes filtered through the lens of the manager or leader. Any potential bias that is there is going to become part of the overall review. “The key here is you have to set up a safe place for employees where their voice is heard and the organization can understand the impact of that sentiment.”
Archive
- October 2024(44)
- September 2024(94)
- August 2024(100)
- July 2024(99)
- June 2024(126)
- May 2024(155)
- April 2024(123)
- March 2024(112)
- February 2024(109)
- January 2024(95)
- December 2023(56)
- November 2023(86)
- October 2023(97)
- September 2023(89)
- August 2023(101)
- July 2023(104)
- June 2023(113)
- May 2023(103)
- April 2023(93)
- March 2023(129)
- February 2023(77)
- January 2023(91)
- December 2022(90)
- November 2022(125)
- October 2022(117)
- September 2022(137)
- August 2022(119)
- July 2022(99)
- June 2022(128)
- May 2022(112)
- April 2022(108)
- March 2022(121)
- February 2022(93)
- January 2022(110)
- December 2021(92)
- November 2021(107)
- October 2021(101)
- September 2021(81)
- August 2021(74)
- July 2021(78)
- June 2021(92)
- May 2021(67)
- April 2021(79)
- March 2021(79)
- February 2021(58)
- January 2021(55)
- December 2020(56)
- November 2020(59)
- October 2020(78)
- September 2020(72)
- August 2020(64)
- July 2020(71)
- June 2020(74)
- May 2020(50)
- April 2020(71)
- March 2020(71)
- February 2020(58)
- January 2020(62)
- December 2019(57)
- November 2019(64)
- October 2019(25)
- September 2019(24)
- August 2019(14)
- July 2019(23)
- June 2019(54)
- May 2019(82)
- April 2019(76)
- March 2019(71)
- February 2019(67)
- January 2019(75)
- December 2018(44)
- November 2018(47)
- October 2018(74)
- September 2018(54)
- August 2018(61)
- July 2018(72)
- June 2018(62)
- May 2018(62)
- April 2018(73)
- March 2018(76)
- February 2018(8)
- January 2018(7)
- December 2017(6)
- November 2017(8)
- October 2017(3)
- September 2017(4)
- August 2017(4)
- July 2017(2)
- June 2017(5)
- May 2017(6)
- April 2017(11)
- March 2017(8)
- February 2017(16)
- January 2017(10)
- December 2016(12)
- November 2016(20)
- October 2016(7)
- September 2016(102)
- August 2016(168)
- July 2016(141)
- June 2016(149)
- May 2016(117)
- April 2016(59)
- March 2016(85)
- February 2016(153)
- December 2015(150)